"There always seems to be a problem with Maryland"

so sayeth the head of Beretta, Ugo Gussalli Beretta, after visiting Beretta's Maryland plant and meeting with Maryland's governor Martin O'Malley. You see, in a move straight out of a Colorado Democrat's playbook, Maryland is moving swiftly to take advantage of the tragedy in Connecticut in order to ban "assault weapons" and those eeevil "high capacity clips." Copying the Colorado Democrats closely; when warned that a revenue generating gun manufacturer will leave; the morally unctuous Democrats (worshiping at the alter of Mammon) quickly added an exception for manufacturers of the tools of baby killing in order keep that dirty money in state. Remember the lesson of Colorado; we will ban high capacity magazines in state but are happy to reap to rewards of selling them out of state. Drat that company Magpul who is planning to shrug!

 However, there's a problem......  This whole "Atlas shrugging" business.  Beretta generates a lot of income and jobs for Maryland and they are planning to start manufacturing the civilian version of the ARX-160 rifle in Maryland.  But....as their legal counsel notes:

Why expand in a place where the people who built the gun couldn’t buy it?” said Jeffrey Reh, general counsel for Beretta

  In other words, Beretta has nearly had enough.  In the 90's Beretta moved a warehouse to neighboring, gun friendly (and with a much, much lower crime rate) Virginia in the 90's in response to Maryland's gun control antics back then.   Again from Mr. Reh:

I think they thought we were bluffing” in the 1990s, Reh said. “But Berettas don’t bluff.”

  You know, it's time for this.  Time for gun manufacturers to leave the sanctimonious hypocrites.   All over the country, companies are standing up for our rights.  I still encourage the individual to stand up for their rights in these states that could care less for the Constitution and individual rights but it's time for companies to leave these states.  Hit these states in their pocketbooks.  Maybe then the voters will wake up come next election cycle as the Democrats who voted for these measure become forever remembered as "they who sent jobs away in the name of doing nothing for crime, jobs, or rights."

  To truly understand the hypocrisy of the Maryland Democrats, ponder the below statement from Governor O'Malley's spokeswoman.  Think upon how staggeringly hypocritical said statement is from the governor that wants to ban "assault weapons" but is apparently FINE with exporting "assault weapons from his state:

“We think getting assault weapons off the streets and keeping this company (here in Maryland) can both be accomplished,” said Raquel Guillory, O’Malley’s spokeswoman.

Atlas may be packing his bags for a different state

  And by "Atlas," I mean the Colorado company that plans on 85 million dollars worth of payroll for the state of Colorado.  Magpul Industries.

  The legislators of Colorado were feeling the need to do something for the children, literally.

"This is about kids who have been shot, over and over and over again," said Democratic Rep. Crisanta Duran said. "I am tired of seeing kids die, year after year, after year, after year."

  Apparently kids are getting shot over and over again in Colorado.  No word on whether or Duran is in favor of ending the war on drugs as opposed to a statistically meaningless move on "high capacity magazines."  

  However, there's a problem.  How can a Democratic politician save the children of his own state from the eeevil high capacity magazines but keep the 600 jobs and 85 million a year in payroll from Magpul Industries?  Well, just backpedal and allow Magpul to export from the now safe state of Colorado.  Duh!  I have emailed Representatives Kagana and Salazar; asking if they are OK with taking in tax money from high capacity magazines sales in other states.

  State Rep. Daniel Kagan, D-Cherry Hills Village, said he plans to offer an amendment Friday that seeks to soften the bill's impact on magazine makers in the state.

"It needs to be clear that manufacturers will be able to still sell and transfer these high-capacity magazines to individuals in other states, the U.S. military and law enforcement," Kagan said. "We want them (Magpul) to stay here in Colorado. It would be sad to see them leave."

State Rep. Joe Salazar, D-Thornton, agrees with Kagan and insists state lawmakers are still giving the Erie-based company an option to do business in Colorado.

"It's imperative to keep jobs here," Salazar said.

Still, neither Kagan or Salazar said they would be willing to vote against the bill banning high-capacity ammunition magazines in an effort to keep Magpul in Colorado.

Read more:Colorado ammo magazine maker Magpul threatens to leave state over gun bill - The Denver Post
(IT guys, note the "if, then" reference)

  Problem solved, right?  Export the baby killing high capacity magazines.  Keep the profits from these baby killing tools in Colorado.  You know, for dolphins, children, and green power.  Fortunately, Joe "Tactical" Biden (described as like a drunken, unfunny uncle by the SEALs of DEVGRU) is buys making phone calls to kill Colorado businesses, encourage Colorado Democrats to stand firm for the children and against evil. 

  But.....Magpul is getting ready to shrug.  Magpul has made it crystal clear that Magpul will uproot and leave the state if Colorado bans standard capacity magazines and enacts legislation to serialize and track said magazines in the state.  As in Magpul understands that gun owners in other states won't buy from a manufacturer so hypocritical as to make high capacity mags in a state where said magazines are banned.  Also, one gets the impression that the leadership at Magpul absolutely agrees with these sentiments.  I wouldn't be surprised to see Remington pack up and leave after Governor Cuomo refused to meet with Remington factory employees before he saved the children of New York State from 10 round magazines by limiting magazines in New York to seven round magazines (those three rounds are deadly!).   Also, Alfred Manufacturing as one of Magpul's contractors (they make PMags for Magpul) has signified their intention to shrug and take 150 jobs with their company out of Colorado.  In fact, there's more than one Alfred Manufacturing like company planning to leave with Magpul.  You see, Magpul's innovation begat jobs.  Jobs and an in state proliferation of polymer (plastic ) based jobs and manufacturers.  Ever hear of Otterbox?  Magpul had something to with that (indirectly).  An entire cottage industry leaving and taking their jobs and tax money with them.  Good move, Colorado.  Talk about bringing 

  Seriously, it's time for the other manufacturers to sack up and follow Magpul's lead.  Les Baer fled Illinois (the most broke state in the country but IL's unions and politics have nothing to do with that, right?).  Colt has already built a facility in Florida.  Fears are mounting in Hartford, CT as some folks suddenly realize the real cost of unions and anti gun state governments.  Armalite is fielding offers from three other states to leave.  Now if DSA and Springfield leaves, maybe Illinois legislators will join Colorado politicians Daniel Kagan and Joe Salazar in being the true shining lights of genuine money grubbing hypocrisy in this uncertain age.  

  Magpul?  Wyoming is about 4 hours away and calling.  No state personal income tax.  Just desolate enough to keep out the non native Coloradans that ruined Colorado.  A state that is firmly libertarian/conservative.  

  Magpul's statement:

n addition to the national battle to protect our firearms rights, many states are currently engaged in their own fights. Here in CO, a state with a strong heritage of firearm and other personal freedoms, we are facing some extreme challenges to firearms rights. We have been engaged in dialogue with legislators here presenting our arguments to stop legislation from even being introduced, but our efforts did not deter those of extreme views. 

After the NRAs visit last week, several anti-freedom bills were introduced by CO legislators, and a very aggressive timeline has been set forth in moving these bills forward. 

The bills include:

HB 1229, Background checks for Gun Transfers--a measure to prohibit private sales between CO residents, and instead require a full FFL transfer, including a 4473.

HB 1228, Payment for Background Checks for Gun Transfers-- a measure that would require CO residents to pay for the back logged state-run CBI system (currently taking 3 times the federally mandated wait time for checks to occur) instead of using the free federal NICS checks. 

And finally, HB 1224, Prohibiting Large Capacity Ammunition Magazines--a measure that bans the possession, sale, or transfer of magazines over 10 round capacity. The measures and stipulations in this bill would deprive CO residents of the value of their private property by prohibiting the sale or transfer of all magazines over 10 rounds. This bill would also prohibit manufacture of magazines greater than 10 rounds for commercial sale out of the state, and place restrictions on the manufacture of military and law enforcement magazines that would cripple production. 

We'd like to ask all CO residents to please contact your state legislators and the members of the Judiciary Committee and urge them to kill these measures in committee, and to vote NO if they reach the floor. 

We also ask you to show your support for the 2nd Amendment at the Capitol on Tuesday, Feb 12, for the magazine ban committee hearing and Wednesday, 

Feb 13, for the hearing on the other measures.

Due to the highly restrictive language in HB 1224, if passed, and we remained here, this measure would require us to cease PMAG production on July 1, 2013.

In short, Magpul would be unable to remain in business as a CO company, and the over 200 jobs for direct employees and nearly 700 jobs at our subcontractors and suppliers would pick up and leave CO. Due to the structure of our operations, this would be entirely possible, hopefully without significant disruption to production. 

The legislators drafting these measures do so in spite of the fact that nothing they are proposing will do anything to even marginally improve public safety in CO, and in fact, will leave law-abiding CO residents less able to defend themselves, strip away rights and property from residents who have done nothing wrong, and send nearly 1000 jobs and millions in tax revenue out of the state. 

We like CO, we want to continue to operate in CO, but most of all, we want CO to remain FREE.

Please help us in this fight, and let your voices be heard!

Magpul's ad this Sunday in the Denver Post

Magpul's statement on proposed Colorado bills

In addition to the national battle to protect our firearms rights, many states are currently engaged in their own fights. Here in CO, a state with a strong heritage of firearm and other personal freedoms, we are facing some extreme challenges to firearms rights. We have been engaged in dialogue with legislators here presenting our arguments to stop legislation from even being introduced, but our efforts did not deter those of extreme views.

After the NRA's visit last week, several anti-freedom bills were introduced by CO legislators, and a very aggressive timeline has been set forth in moving these bills forward.

The bills include:
HB 1229, Background checks for Gun Transfers--a measure to prohibit private sales between CO residents, and instead require a full FFL transfer, including a 4473.

HB 1228, Payment for Background Checks for Gun Transfers-- a measure that would require CO residents to pay for the back logged state-run CBI system (currently taking 3 times the federally mandated wait time for checks to occur) instead of using the free federal NICS checks.

And finally, HB 1224, Prohibiting Large Capacity Ammunition Magazines--a measure that bans the possession, sale, or transfer of magazines over 10 round capacity. The measures and stipulations in this bill would deprive CO residents of the value of their private property by prohibiting the sale or transfer of all magazines over 10 rounds. This bill would also prohibit manufacture of magazines greater than 10 rounds for commercial sale out of the state, and place restrictions on the manufacture of military and law enforcement magazines that would cripple production.

We'd like to ask all CO residents to please contact your state legislators and the members of the Judiciary Committee and urge them to kill these measures in committee, and to vote NO if they reach the floor.

We also ask you to show your support for the 2nd Amendment at the Capitol on Tuesday, Feb 12, for the magazine ban committee hearing and Wednesday,
Feb 13, for the hearing on the other measures.

Due to the highly restrictive language in HB 1224, if passed, and we remained here, this measure would require us to cease PMAG production on July 1, 2013.

In short, Magpul would be unable to remain in business as a CO company, and the over 200 jobs for direct employees and nearly 700 jobs at our subcontractors and suppliers would pick up and leave CO. Due to the structure of our operations, this would be entirely possible, hopefully without significant disruption to production.

The legislators drafting these measures do so in spite of the fact that nothing they are proposing will do anything to even marginally improve public safety in CO, and in fact, will leave law-abiding CO residents less able to defend themselves, strip away rights and property from residents who have done nothing wrong, and send nearly 1000 jobs and millions in tax revenue out of the state.

We like CO, we want to continue to operate in CO, but most of all, we want CO to remain FREE.

Please help us in this fight, and let your voices be heard!

We have included the contact information for the House Judiciary committee for your convenience:

House Judiciary Committee
Rep. Daniel Kagan, Chair: 303-866-2921, repkagan@gmail.com
Rep. Pete Lee, Vice Chair: 303-866-2932, pete.lee.house@state.co.us
Rep. John Buckner: 303-866-2944, john.buckner.house@state.co.us
Rep. Lois Court: 303-866-2967, lois.court.house@state.co.us
Rep. Bob Gardner, 303-866-2191, bob.gardner.house@state.co.us
Rep. Polly Lawrence, 303-866-2935, polly.lawrence.house@state.co.us
Rep. Mike McLachlan, 303-866-2914, mike.mclachlan.house@state.co.us
Rep. Rep Carole Murray, 303-866-2948, murrayhouse45@gmail.com
Rep. Brittany Pettersen, 303-866-2939, brittany.pettersen.house@state.co.us
Rep. Joseph Salazar, 303-866-2918, joseph.salazar.house@state.co.us
Rep. Jared Wright, 303-866-2583, jared.wright.house@state.co.us

Stand and Fight Colorado

Travis Haley's newest business venture (MULTI ACTIVE WARNING)

  I'm not really hating on Haley but damn dude.......  Who saw this coming?  I mean; shaving and skin care products " "Designed for military, law enforcement, adventurers or businessman who spend time in the outdoors or on the road."

  No word on Costa's rumored beard trimmer release date........

Commentary from a friend in Baltimore

  On the Superbowl (Baltimore Ravens won).

17 people have now been murdered in Baltimore as celebration.  Rumor is they will try to get to 52 tonight, just to honor Ray.

Obviously, this is a joke.  Only sixteen people have been murdered in Baltimore in the past 30 days (six in the past week).  Oddly enough, Maryland's strict gun control and limitation of carry permits have not made it a safer place to be than say....neighboring, gun friendly Virginia.  Perplexing indeed but Governor O'Malley's bill banning "assault weapons,' "high capacity magazines," and fingerprinting gun buyers will fix this problem.

Governor O'Malley is considering a 2016 presidential bid.  It is not known at this time if he owns a shotgun like everyone else who wants to ban guns. 

Joe Biden Tactical

“Guess what? A shotgun will keep you a lot safer, a double-barreled shotgun, than the assault weapon in somebody’s hands [who] doesn’t know how to use it, even one who does know how to use it,” the outspoken vice president, a shotgun owner himself, replied. “It’s harder to use an assault weapon to hit something than it is a shotgun. You want to keep people away in an earthquake? Buy some shotgun shells.”

  No harm is confusing this with Jack Booted Thugs Tactical

  Yes, of course!  You see, the lesser recoil, adjustable for arm length stock, better sights. and far faster reloading of the "assault rifle" (Unky Joe means mo dern sporting rifles (MSRs) or military style sporting rifles?) are impediments.  Because, you don't have to aim a shotgun, right?  And 2 shots are all you'd ever need to defend yourself or "keep people away in an earthquake." Which is why Biden's security team carries double barreled shotguns instead of rifles.

  Any attentive gun owner will be scratching his or her head at this point, wondering how the anti gun folk can bray on about how "assault rifles are designed to spray bullets from the hip" (sans aiming, we can assume) but a shotgun that you allegedly don't have to aim is just fine, folks.

  Fresh from imparting these hard won tactical lessons from a life of politics in Washington DC (Joe has never served in the military nor law enforcement), our dear drunken, uncle had another sewer of the mouth moment and just happened to mention that:

Nothing we’re going to do is going to fundamentally alter or eliminate the possibility of another mass shooting or guarantee that we will bring gun deaths down to 1,000 a year from what it is now,” he told the group of reporters.

 Remember folks, fuck those military veterans, cops, and anyone else who tells you otherwise about weapons choices.  Especially, those damned sheriffs that keep on running their mouths about Unky Joe's gun control efforts.  Look for more nonsensical drivel like this as people that want to ban guns explain that they are on your side because they own a shotgun (like Governor Cuomo )or because they shot a shotgun once like Obama.  Also, remember gun control isn't about guns.  It's about control.

Contempt

  A legal immigrant makes a dignified, well reasoned call for sanity regarding the latest gun control hysteria in Connecticut.  The man's diction is perfect, his reasoning sound, his demeanor calm.  Watch for yourself and it's OK to applaud.

What does his Senator Beth Bye do as this man reads his carefully prepared speech and pleads for his lawmakers to listen?

Talk shit on Facebook.  Her mind is already made up and see what she was doing while at her job.  While a man makes a reason, calm, prepared speech; his Senator cannot be bothered to get off Facebook while at work.  Whether you disagree with Mr. Ong or not, anyone can and should be infuriated with the loathsome Beth Bye's juvenile and reprehensible conduct.